How renting a three bedroom house got cheaper in the last 20 years

author-avatar By
on February 17, 2020
How renting a three bedroom house got cheaper in the last 20 years

Photo by Digital Marketing Agency NTWRK on Unsplash

Analysis released by the Productivity Commission today shows how much stronger the average Aussie's purchasing power is compared to 20 years ago.

While consumer goods have increased in price and our wage growth has slowed, we're still doing better than 20 years ago when it comes to our purchasing power, according to a Productivity Commission report released today.

In the year 2000 it took 13.9 hours of work for the average Aussie to afford a week's rent for a 3-bedroom house - in 2019 it took 11.8.

This is despite housing rental costs rising in real dollar terms over that period. 

Other consumer items to become significantly cheaper over the last two decades included bicycles, antibiotics, break and milk:

  • In 2000, to buy a bicycle you had to work 17.8 hours - in 2019 just 7.5. In 1901 a bicycle took over a month's work (527.4 hours) to pay for.
  • A 'game of football' in 2000 took 1.2 hours to pay for - the same as today.
  • 1kg of rump steak in 2000 took 41.8 minutes to buy - in 2019 just 38.
  • Startlingly, it took 18 minutes to buy antibiotics in 2000, and only 8.6 in 2019.
  • Bread: 7.7 in 2000, now 5.5, and milk 4.7 - now just 2.2 minutes worked.

Source: Productivity Commission Productivity Insights 2020

Aussie smokers however are required to work a lot longer to earn their smokes, with a single pack of cigarettes in 2019 costing 92.5 minutes' work - up from just 37.4 minutes in 2000, invariably due to government excise increases.

The positive purchasing power data is despite Australia experiencing a productivity slump, with both labour productivity (output per worker) and multifactor productivity (output per combination of inputs such as labour and machinery) in the market sector falling over 2018-19 - the first fall since the peak of the mining boom. 

Labor productivity fell by 0.2% while multifactor productivity fell 0.4%.

"During the mining boom, much of the benefit of a higher exchange rate was, desirably, passed through to workers as higher purchasing power," the report outlined.

"But as the commodity price boom has dissipated and the exchange rate has fallen, much of the effect has similarly passed through to consumers as slower growth in the purchasing power of their wages."

The table below displays a snapshot of savings accounts with some of the highest non-introductory interest rates on the market. 


4000$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

Online Saver (Amounts < $499999)

    4000$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

    High Interest Savings Account (< $250k)

      4001$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

      Online Saver ($1-$100k)

        0100$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

        Mighty Saver

          000$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

          Online Savings Account (<$250k)

            4001$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

            Lifestyle Account (< $75k)

              000$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]$product[$field["value"]]More details

              Bonus Saver Account (Amounts < $100k)

                Rates based on a savings balance of $10,000. Introductory bonus interest rate products not included. Sorted by total interest rates. Refer to providers' websites for bonus rate conditions. Rates correct as of June 25, 2022. View disclaimer.

                What does productivity mean for wages?

                The fall in productivity doesn't bode well for wages growth.

                According to the Productivity Commission, about half of the slowdown in wages growth in recent years has been driven by labour productivity decline.

                Meanwhile, about a fifth of the wages slowdown can be attributed to a continued decline in the labour share of income since 2000.

                This has been mainly attributed to the labour share of income being reallocated to the mining sector, and increased profitability in the finance sector.

                However, that's all come to a slowdown, as investment in mining has fallen since 2012-13, with productivity generally having a direct relationship with wage growth.

                Australia is slowing in productivity like other developed nations, such as the US and UK, despite still riding the waves of the mining boom.

                "It is possible that labour productivity will continue growing at historically slower rates indefinitely and that the labour share of income may fall again in the future," the report noted.

                The Productivity Commission also revealed economic growth had been driven by labour, rather than business investment.

                This is despite the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates to historic lows, theoretically making the cost of doing business more attractive.


                Productivity explained. Source: Productivity Commission

                Biggest industry winners and losers

                The Productivity Commission revealed the biggest fall in productivity by sector was experienced by the drought-affected agricultural sector.

                That sector was down 10.1% in productivity, and contributed 29% to the overall slowdown.

                Just six of the 16 market sector industries experienced an increase in productivity.

                The biggest winner was the arts and recreation sector, up 4.9% in productivity. 

                However, the mining sector is still the biggest winner when it comes to GVA (gross value added) - in 2018-19 it grew 6.1% largely due to gas extraction and its export as LNG (liquefied natural gas).

                In non-market sectors (public administration and safety, education and training, and health care and social assistance), the biggest loser was public administration and safety.

                That sector lost 8.3% in productivity, yet experienced an increase of 11.6% in hours worked.


                Source: Giphy

                Latest Articles

                Harrison is's Assistant Editor. Prior to joining Savings in January 2020, he worked for some of Australia's largest comparison sites and media organisations. With a keen interest in the economy, housing policy, and personal finance, Harrison strives to deliver and edit news and guides that are engaging, thought-provoking, and simple to read.


                Be Savings smart.
                Subscribe for free money newsletters.

                By subscribing you agree
                to the Savings Privacy Policy